Sad
Although I’d expect the grammar bad for comedic effect
Rather than unintentionally
Sad
Although I’d expect the grammar bad for comedic effect
Rather than unintentionally


Because that’s how most people implicitly frame headlines like this one: a generalization of the public


Oh i know
I’m more blaming the system than the user. The system is designed to be as addicting as possible. Literally a century of addiction research into drugs and gambling, all used to squeeze every drop of engagement from the user


Anything to get that dopamine drip from the Black Rectangle


It’s not about what the user wants. It’s about what will make the most profit for Microsoft
deleted by creator
Something needs to fill the role of civil protection services
Though, how to do that without encouraging corruption, i dunno
Hyperfocus does not allow for frivolities such as walking, peripheral vision, eating, or sleeping


You know, you could just ask what that means
s/org/li means replace org with li
I did do the Nasty in the Pasty
I can’t wait for all the new year’s resolutioners to show up at the gym so I can smash them
(Brazilian jiu jitsu)
They are selling user data for profit. It’s anonymized sure, but it’s still selling user data
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/
TL;DR Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data”), and we don’t buy data about you. We changed our language because some jurisdictions define “sell” more broadly than most people would usually understand that word. Firefox has built-in privacy and security features, plus options that let you fine-tune your data settings.

Removing “no we will never sell your data” from your Q/A page is not a good look
Firefox is the biggest non-chromium browser competitor, and was an advocate of privacy and not selling user data
But they recently did a 180, started selling user data, and are now shoving FF full of AI bloatware nobody wants
So the userbase is feeling very betrayed


I understand what you mean,
but it is technically the choice of the animal to eat more than they need on a regular basis


But it doesn’t have any built-in concept of users, write permissions, or authentication (except for commit signing)
Hosting an unauthenticated git repo would be the equivalent to an open ssh port with no password required
Not to mention collaborative things like issue tracking, PRs, forums, etc


I wonder if it’d be feasible to make a fediverse github
Snake milk
Snilk
If history repeats itself, ES6 will be a completely different game to Skyrim
Everything complained about will he cut, nothing new will be added