1/3? Man, those are rookie numbers. Something like 80% of my home state were members at one time.
(Which makes sense, as back then we had actual laws on the books that made us a ‘whites only’ state.)
1/3? Man, those are rookie numbers. Something like 80% of my home state were members at one time.
(Which makes sense, as back then we had actual laws on the books that made us a ‘whites only’ state.)


Except it’s not very good. I turn it off and still get AI pictures and videos, and it gets rid of some pictures I know aren’t AI.
Or, hot take, a company that sells clothes with pockets makes less money than a company that sells clothes without pockets and then offers ladies $50-150 purses to compensate. If you think the fashion industry hasn’t noticed that, you’re crazy.
It’s like how the American auto industry noticed they could make more money selling big vehicles and so all of them just stopped making smaller cars. Plenty of Americans say they want smaller cars, but the American auto makers don’t care.
No, it’s definitely a thing, and trends more in clothes geared to older women. When I shopped at Forever 21 back when I was in my 20s, I was a size 4-6; when I shopped at REI I was a size 4. When I shopped at Chicos, on the other hand, which caters almost exclusively to older women, I was a size 0. And sometimes even that was too big on me.
They want us to all go back to saying things like ‘she’s in a delicate condition’ and shit lol
Then why are you everywhere in the comments making all kinds of effort to complain about the artist and the message you see in their work?
Seems if we all agree this sort of thing happens to women, now and again, then we have nothing to argue over.
Well yes. But that twat was all up in the ‘not all men!’ and ‘women do bad stuff too!’ so I just opted to make it more gender-neutral so they wouldn’t derail the conversation with inanities again.
The problem is they found new ones lol. Anything but actually discussing the core issues and their personal issues, I guess.
No, they didn’t? This literally happens?
Where in the comic does it say ‘all men do this’? Because that seems to be your interpretation.
It seems you’re projecting quite a lot onto this comic for some reason, and you’re driven to fight to prove your interpretation of the comic isn’t true. You might want to do some introspection and think about why that is.
She’s not interested.
I’m assuming you identify/present male? If so, she is afraid of openly rejecting a man. There’s an old ‘joke’ that would be funnier if it was less true: men are afraid women will laugh at them; women are afraid men will kill them.
Trust me, you would get a lot more than ‘thanks’ if she was in to you.
It seems more like you’re the one deliberately making a bad-faith argument by feigning ignorance of the meaning of the question, but what the heck, I’ll bite.
In case you didn’t know, the statement about bear vs stranger is simple: both could be dangerous. But the bear you know at a distance is dangerous, and bears are rather more predictable than humans. The stranger, on the other hand, is far less predictable, and you don’t know if they’re safe or dangerous until you get close.
After all, she/he could be crazy and carrying a gun, and you don’t need to be a speedy 600lb killing machine to be deadly with one of those.
And that is why women chose the bear.
Yeah, but you have to factor in the rabid Christian belief that she’s an eternal virgin. So they have to make up all kinds of complicated explanations for how any siblings could exist.
(According to official doctrine they were either cousins or children of Joseph’s from a previous marriage)


As a fellow American, we really don’t need any help looking bad at the moment, so you can stop now.


Wow, how old is he?


Sandy looks so good! She’s a natural in front of the camera ;)


That write up on finding the German family that vanished in Death Valley really did a good showcase of how easily that can happen.
‘At that moment they were in a survival situation, although they did not yet realize that fact.’
? Wasn’t he a just kid in WWII?


Circumcision removes a lot of the sensitive tissue, making it harder for a man to climax, especially while masturbating.
It’s done primarily by religious loons to ‘keep men from committing sin’, since they believe the only way a man should ever climax is during penetrative sex with a woman. But even then a circumcised man will feel less pleasure than an uncircumcised one.
So this is primarily done to get some of the feeling back, both to be able to masturbate easier and to have greater pleasure during sex.


Wow. When I saw the article I figured it would be bad, but that’s even worse than I expected lol
What is it with these idiots trying to re-brand racism and reinvent phrenology every few decades? Are they stupid enough to believe they’re the first to think of shit like this, or are they hoping we’re dumb enough to fall for it this time around?
My aunt’s cat was basically a neighborhood cat lol. I remember once we were taking a stroll around the neighborhood together and happened to look in one of the neighbor’s windows… and there he was, stretched out on the back of the couch, watching football with the neighbor.
When she moved out everyone came by to say goodbye to her cat lol