Have strong opinions, but welcome all civil discussions.

Mastodon: @BrikoX@freeradical.zone

  • 1.53K Posts
  • 264 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle







  • You don’t need to subsidize EU industry at the taxpayers expense to achieve economic independence. Refusing cheaper goods for arbitrary reasons just makes EU look stupid. The key is to buy on your own terms under which you never give foreign nation control over you.

    Look at France. Their whole country is built on sovereign independence in critical areas. They achieved it buy building their own industry, while taking goods deals from other countries, not by refusing them and making their own people lives harder.


  • What EU should really do is accept the cheap solar panels from China but under their own terms. No remote access data, storage in EU only, and enforce EU legal jurisdiction for all disputes. China needs a market, they will accept those conditions. It would be huge win/win for both sides.

    Moving away from cheap goods to protect non-existing industry doesn’t makes any sense, but that’s what corporate “centrism” gets you in the EU. Buy cheap while you build your own industry and then when you reach competitive state you can change the terms.





















  • Last time I checked only the supreme court has the authority to declare something unconstitutional.

    That is not entirely correct. They have the final say in determining what that is, but anyone can declare something unconstitutional based on prior Supreme Court decisions.

    The whole US federal legal system is based on that since you first need to get a judgment in trial court, then appeal and only then you can get to the Supreme Court (in 99.99% cases as there are narrow exceptions).










  • BrikoX@lemmy.zipMtoTechnology@lemmy.zip*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Small copies of existing technologies aren’t novelty nor innovation.

    Well, this just shows your ignorance on the subject. The biggest irony is that you probably don’t even know when you use some EU innovation since they aggressively promote open research, so it’s not hiding behind a patent to be abused to by a single greedy corporation…



  • BrikoX@lemmy.zipMtoTechnology@lemmy.zip*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    EU has been for a long time investing in innovation and supporting open source development. Lemmy for one is partially funded by EU funds…

    The issue is an economic centrism which dominates the EU governance so while there are plenty EU supported and developed alternatives they are not used. But as much as hate LLMs it seems that was the push required for EU to reconsider their approach. Combine that with the friends turning into foes and the future tech sector in the EU looks bright.