gigastasio@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 4 days agoWhat fictional animal do you think would be the most delicious?message-squaremessage-square110linkfedilinkarrow-up172arrow-down110
arrow-up162arrow-down1message-squareWhat fictional animal do you think would be the most delicious?gigastasio@sh.itjust.works to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square110linkfedilink
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up11·4 days agoThis. Winnie the Pooh is canonically a teddy bear, presumably only alive by some sort of magic. Likewise, Kanga, Roo, Eeyore, Tigger and Piglet. Rabbit and Owl, however, were real, living creatures - the true inhabitants of the wood - with related magic allowing them to interact. So basically, yes, Pooh isn’t edible.
This. Winnie the Pooh is canonically a teddy bear, presumably only alive by some sort of magic. Likewise, Kanga, Roo, Eeyore, Tigger and Piglet.
Rabbit and Owl, however, were real, living creatures - the true inhabitants of the wood - with related magic allowing them to interact.
So basically, yes, Pooh isn’t edible.