California’s new bill requires DOJ-approved 3D printers that report on themselves targeting general-purpose machines.

Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan introduced AB-2047, the “California Firearm Printing Prevention Act,” on February 17th. The bill would ban the sale or transfer of any 3D printer in California unless it appears on a state-maintained roster of approved makes and models… certified by the Department of Justice as equipped with “firearm blocking technology.” Manufacturers would need to submit attestations for every make and model. The DOJ would publish a list. If your printer isn’t on the list by March 1, 2029, it can’t be sold. In addition, knowingly disabling or circumventing the blocking software is a misdemeanor.

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It is specifically trying to prevent people from making firearms that is not detectable with a metal detector. You are allowed to create your own firearm. As long as it is detectable with a metal detector.

    I’m not here to argue their method of enforcement. I’m just saying what the purpose is.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I guarantee that those guns have metal powder in them to make them detectable.

        Since all firearms owned by civilians must be detectable by metal detectors.

        • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          They have metal internal components just like almost every 3d printed gun does. There are some things that you just need metal for, like springs. The vast majority of 3d printed guns are actually guns purchased from a gun store and then modified with the equivalent of handmade after-market parts.

          In order to be undetectable by metal detectors, you would have to keep the amount of metal in them to about that of a pair of glasses. So basically a firing pin and that’s about it. I think a break action firing chamber would probably set it off like a big belt buckle would, and no recoil or magazine springs mean that it would have to be a single shot weapon with a manual reload - some kind of break action. And no barrel liner or a metal barrel at all, nor metal bullet casings. A shotgun shell might be able to make it through because of their mostly plastic shell with a copper back about the size of a quarter, but that’s gonna be about it.

          It’s really not the issue that politicians and the media make it out to be. It’s just fear mongering.

          • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I can see you care about this topic. I’m not here to piss in your soup. I just said what the purpose is.

            But in essence you are correct. The problem isn’t that you can print certain parts, it’s how easy it is to access everyone else supporting it. E.g. bullets or shells