cm0002@europe.pub to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 23 days agoSupreme Court rules ISPs aren't liable for user piracy without intentwww.techspot.comexternal-linkmessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down10cross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.world
arrow-up16arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court rules ISPs aren't liable for user piracy without intentwww.techspot.comcm0002@europe.pub to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 23 days agomessage-square5linkfedilinkcross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.world
minus-squareleoj@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·23 days agoI think this is good, right? Feels like the first time the supreme court has done something I agree with in a while…
minus-squarecm0002@europe.pubOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-223 days agoIt’s very good, but it’s also one of those things where they did the right things (essentially preventing forcing an ISP to be a enforcer of sorts) for the wrong reasons (Cox had more money)
minus-squareWizard3964@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·23 days agoISP has more money than music industry
I think this is good, right? Feels like the first time the supreme court has done something I agree with in a while…
It’s very good, but it’s also one of those things where they did the right things (essentially preventing forcing an ISP to be a enforcer of sorts) for the wrong reasons (Cox had more money)
ISP has more money than music industry