Suggesting examples are not the same as explaining and therefore the interviewee will not be hired and therefore it is not a deadlock
Suggesting examples are not the same as explaining
But the interviewee didnt suggest an example, they merely attempted to create a deadlock.
However, in their attempt to do so they imply that they CAN explain a deadlock and therefore should get the job.
The interviewer doesnt ask for an explanation, only if the interviewee is able to provide one.
I have a feeling that you have to do better than “implying” you know something to land a job
I have a feeling this post is a joke
That’s not possible. Everything on the internet is super serious.
Oh. That’s good.
Isn’t that the haircut The Misfits invented in the 80s?
That’s the devil locks lol
Oh, right. Then it must be Bob Marley’s hair:
No that’s dreadlocks. A deadlock is an early class of battleship.
It’s what your safe has when the batteries for the keypad stop working.
Something something dining philosophers.
The interviewer should ask him to explain livelock, and then leave the room.
As someone who works with door hardware, this would be a pretty easy interview.
From listening to deviant’s talks, deadlatches still seem to be widely misunderstood.