• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe private interests are not the best way to compete in scientific discovery. Profit motive directly hinders discovery and safety.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree to an extent, but I think this is a good start. We can’t go on forever with nested redundancy. It would be good to have the ability to troubleshoot and self repair in space. This kind of problem will push us toward breakdown/fix mentality that we’ll eventually need if we expect to get off the earth and stay off. Private may not be the best for scientific discovery, but figuring out how to do it without massive government funding will eventually bring it closer to the common person.

    • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Government-funded manned spaceflight programs aren’t done for pure science either. It’s a cool kids club where money is allocated for political reasons (“nation prestige” or some other bullshit). NASA didn’t land on the moon because American senators were fans of science, they were tasked with it to “beat” USSR.

      Science-based space exploration should use automatic probes only, anything else is a waste of money.