I think Americans ought to realise that the role of president in most countries is not similar to the US presidential role. In many countries they are inconsequential figureheads, heck, a lot of countries don’t even have presidents.
I thought rise of fascism was mainly reponsibility of people who vote for fascists and candidates who have nothing to suggest to fight fascism and make people lives better but I guess I was wrong.
Political extremists are more likely to consistently vote. When fewer people vote overall due to apathy, that makes it far easier for extremists to take control
Except, there is no definition of “political extremist” here. Is someone far-left an extremist? What about someone in a “center” party? I call the first one a non-extremist and the second one a extremist. Someone who votes for the centre may say otherwise. I don’t get your point. The ones responsible for the rise of fascism are people who vote for fascists, end of story 🤷
And this, dear lemmings, is why fascism and authoritarianism have been gaining traction the past few years
I think Americans ought to realise that the role of president in most countries is not similar to the US presidential role. In many countries they are inconsequential figureheads, heck, a lot of countries don’t even have presidents.
I thought rise of fascism was mainly reponsibility of people who vote for fascists and candidates who have nothing to suggest to fight fascism and make people lives better but I guess I was wrong.
Political extremists are more likely to consistently vote. When fewer people vote overall due to apathy, that makes it far easier for extremists to take control
Except, there is no definition of “political extremist” here. Is someone far-left an extremist? What about someone in a “center” party? I call the first one a non-extremist and the second one a extremist. Someone who votes for the centre may say otherwise. I don’t get your point. The ones responsible for the rise of fascism are people who vote for fascists, end of story 🤷