In all your examples there is the ground to provide a counteracting force. Maybe I am misunderstanding what you mean by untethered, but any initial airspeed difference between the wind and your system will eventually vanish and you’ll move along with the surrounding air.

I co-founded an AWE startup 8 years ago and let me tell you, literature does not support your claim.

An untethered AWE cannot produce any power

Recaptcha v2 does way more than check if the box was checked.

https://stackoverflow.com/a/27299487

What a weird hill to die on. Is it about letting people die or about influencers livestreaming?

What about comms during catastrophies? Small villages or off-grid houses? Remote research installations?

I swear, Lemmy is becoming more reactionary by the day.

Unexpected Knopfler

You are thinking of LLMs, not AI in general.

Any AI? Every application? What kind of statement is this?

How do realistic zombies look like?

What are you on about?

That’s some weird gatekeeping. Why stop there? Whoever is using a linter is obviously too stupid to write clean code right off the bat. Syntax highlighting is for noobs.

I full-heartedly dislike people that think they need to define some arcane rules how a task is achieved instead of just looking at the output.

Accept that you probably already have merged code that was generated by AI and it’s totally fine as long as tests are passing and it fits the architecture.

Du

Wait but distillers will surely usw the API instead oft the Frontend, right?

Instead of being condescending, how about you just go ahead and contribute that information yourself? Sheesh

Third time’s the farm

So what is intelligence in your general, all-purpose understanding?

Are newborns intelligent? How about dogs? Ants?

You may argue that current AI is still behind an average human adult and therefore not intelligent, but academia is a bit more nuanced.

How are they getting my metadata?

Have you even read the article?

TL;DR?