

That is more down to poor marketing. Here on Lemmy or reddit there are big open source communities where you can extol the values of it.
That is more down to poor marketing. Here on Lemmy or reddit there are big open source communities where you can extol the values of it.
I never went with a software project from random scrolling. It has no value to me if it doesn’t meet a need I have right now.
No contributor is going to be good that doesn’t use it.
Why would it be? Software is good based on it’s use and recommendations from real folk, not *s. Many project not on github
Minecraft is one of the biggest games on the planet. Very popular with the young. Not what many would consider beautiful.
That is quite a mixed bag response. Leaves me between they won’t do nothing, and they might do something.
Isn’t this just the tech version of cuckooing?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckooing
Illegally using someone’s property to make profit from dodgy business.
Oh yeah, I see now. I misread that.
She went to war with unions and the working class. Destroyed workers rights, used the police to antagonise and dismantle strikes, left towns and cities in economic decline. She screwed a LOT of people. Many hate her here.
Blender or GIMP? Idk.
I didn’t realise Valve had gone into vaccinations, but Mumps, Measles and Rubella are nasty fuckers.
Unit tests, yes, but you don’t only do unit tests. Integration and e2e tests still exist.
Was there even tests?
I’m not sure what’s with your first sentence. Everything else you said agreed with the point I was making…
Real mugs.
Henry Ford invented breaks to extract more out of the peasant Labour.
The fact we’re years later and cognitively demanding jobs don’t support this well show how amateur managers are and his spineless devs that enable them are.
In agile development. You do a little, release. Otherwise it is too big and may never be done. The fact they committed resources to improve this is a positive. The hope is they build on it and add more options.
However, if they get trashed for trying, they and many other companies may not try. Why spend money to get a bad reputation when the spending nothing creates less I’ll will to the company. That is ultimately the decision Product Owners and Designers will weigh up.
I think for progress, the best approach is maybe “positive first step but more options are needed for non-bonary for this to really make players feel comfortable”.
From a technical perspective, separating pronoun hard coding from the models gives more scope to give more options in the future, however, as someone mentioned, there is a lot of art work needed on assets and animations so the new shapes function the same in all cases.
First one is about Germany, not UK. Secondly, you do realise wikipedia is unreliable, prone to edit wars and subject to those that have the most passion for a topic (like free speech “absolutists”/racists). It’s why academia tell you its a poor reference and to not bother.
Can you find a UK example that you think overstepped the line?
I’m in the UK, critical of Israel and not been arrested yet…
It’s always interesting seeing distrorted American views of the UK.
No you cannot. Assuming you’re not from the UK.
Stirring up racial hatred and geeing people up to burn down hotels holding refugees is not free speech.
Fair point. I thought you were implying the opposite.
I read it as implying Labour is anti-free speech for clamping down on racist hate speech and mob mentality.
Can you explain this point?
Yes. You corrected a dyslexic. Well done.