Yup. I don’t think training should be considered breaking copyright. Regurgitating though should.

There are examples of use cases besides the right now obvious one of LLMs “creating” “original” content.

One that comes to my mind is indexing books. Allowing for people to search for books based on a description.

On the other hand, it is not the learning in your example that is illegal, but the recital.

If you learn ten books by heart and make money writing shitty fanfics, thats not necessarily illegal.

and the music

deleted by creator

https://youtu.be/gihOrSdfEPs

I love stomp

Not the article, the commenter before you points at a deeper issue.

It doesn’t matter how if your prompt tells it not to lie is it isn’t actually capable of following that instruction.

I assume they’re talking about the design and training, not the prompt.

I still see it too, interestingly

if someone has ideas, I say let them cook. Open sourcing this can’t be bad for anyone imo.

Though I agree in a way, I don’t understand what anyone found potentially useful with this thing in the first place.

knowing about them does not correlate very well with owning them

as digitized almost all societal functions are, we really should define basic internet access as a human right.

This varies from place to place. This is handled really badly in some places and much better in others.

hotels are controlled by laws and zoning, airbnb gets around that and turns planned living space into hotel space.

Appartment hotels maybe?

hotels/hostels?

Airbnb turns potential living space into hotel space and thereby helps driving up housing prices. The whole concept is inherently problematic.

this is true, but high quality doesnt mitigate the inherent limitations

I’ve study botany and the term fruit is used extensively.

…Yes?

you should probably read my comment again

Removed by mod

Removed by mod