It’s not a loophole though.

Correct, but this is about collecting it without any crime.

Nope. Compliance check lists matter when you are audited by external companies for things like PCI. It’s also not a lot of effort, nor is it ineffective, nor is making sure software is up to date ignored.

If a company on enterprise plans has non-IT technical people doing their technical policies then nothing will save them.

As I said in another comment:

Also most people don’t sit there in meetings with their finger on the screenshot key ready to go - but it is simple to just press a screenshot key on your keyboard. It’s a little bit harder to have your phone up and with the camera open the entire time ready to take photos, especially if cameras are on - especially if something just pops up briefly on screen and you realise you want to capture it.

This is only going to keep honest people honest.

It’s going to keep the overwhelming amount of people “honest”, and it’s going to give companies an extra tick box on any security audits that are integral to the company doing business.

Probably, but won’t really know until it comes out.

Bit more effort and harder to do when something only briefly flashes on screen than it is to hit the screenshot button on almost every keyboard.

My problem with it is that it gives a sense of security that does not exist.

It gives security for 99% of people that will ever be on the calls, and most importantly it gives the company something to point to whenever they get security audits.

Non-Technical folk will click the button and think they’re safe

Non-technical folk aren’t usually responsible for setting policies in enterprise software lol. They won’t have an option.

The feature is fine in theory. In practice, especially with work from home, it’s useless to achieve the goal it set out to. The article even points it out.

While true, that doesn’t really matter when it comes to enterprise. For security compliance you have to be shown to be doing everything that you can to prevent security breaches etc. This feature is another tick box that you can show to whoever is doing your audits to show that you are doing it.

Also most people don’t sit there in meetings with their finger on the screenshot key ready to go - but it is simple to just press a screenshot key on your keyboard. It’s a little bit harder to have your phone up and with the camera open the entire time ready to take photos, especially if cameras are on - especially if something just pops up briefly on screen and you realise you want to capture it.

I don’t know your experience in enterprise, but I can tell you that a feature like this will be much applauded by those running companies for the reasons above.

It’s like that most likely due to running out of ink. It looks like a bigger collection of needles, not just a single fine line one.

Sounds like an easy removal at least.

“To address the issue of unauthorized screen captures during meetings, the Prevent Screen Capture feature ensures that if a user attempts to take a screen capture, the meeting window will turn black, thereby protecting sensitive information,” Microsoft shared in a new Microsoft 365 roadmap entry.

“This feature will be available on Teams desktop applications (both Windows and Mac) and Teams mobile applications (both iOS and Android).”

Yeah, seems like a perfectly reasonable feature to add. It will also likely be a toggle-able feature switch.

Surely there’s no way Lemmy gets angry at this, right?

Reads comments

Who’s deciding what?

can you please show me some examples? Should be easy to find them based on your comment.

Which AI models? Can you share some examples please?

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

That arguments not going to be of any use then.

They don’t do that.

Hit the nail on the head.