• 4 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 18th, 2024

help-circle

  • Instead of using a caliper, like the others have said, you can measure the distance with your printer if you don’t have such a tool.

    Just go into the “Move axis”-mode, and move your nozzle from the home position to the top layer.

    Let’s say your coordinates are now X0, Y0 and Z49,3.

    You can then move the object in your slicer by just changing your Z axis to -49,3.

    Just make sure you:

    1. Get a good first layer, without getting an elephant’s foot.
    2. Don’t use too much glue. A good choice is acrylic glue, but it will alter the surface if it droops out or is too far outside.
    3. Don’t mechanically stress the object too much. It won’t be as strong as before.




  • Logseq and Obsidian are only similar on the first look, but very different usage wise. Both are very open with a plugin system, and you can modify them to turn them into one eachother.

    So, if you want only FOSS, then Logseq is the only choices you have.

    But Obsidian is, even though it’s proprietary, very sane. Open plug-in system, active community, great devs who don’t have much against FOSS, and more.


    Obsidian

    • More similar to a classic note taking app, like OneNote, but with a lot of features. Hierarchical structure, and more of an “essay” style, where you store a lot of text in one page.
    • Page linking is only done when you think it makes sense
    • Has been a bit longer around than Logseq, feels more polished
    • Great sync and mobile app, which support plugins from what I’ve heard

    Logseq

    • Non-linear outliner. Every page is on the same level, but within a text passage, the indentation matters (parent-child-relationship)
    • You create a LOT of more pages. Most of my pages are empty. They are mainly there for linking topics. I rarely create pages manually.
    • The journal is where you write most stuff. You then link each block to a page.
    • Logseq a bit “special”. May not be for everyone. I for example am a bit of a disorganised thinker, who mentally links a lot of knowledge and throws concepts around all the time. Logseq is my second nature, because it’s more flexible. My GF on the other hand is more structured, and prefers something like Apple Notes, or, if she would care about note taking, something like Obsidian.
    • The mobile app isn’t great. It’s fine when I’m not at home, but the desktop version is the “proper” one, and mobile/ iPad a second class citizen.
    • Sync is only experimental for now. It will soon be officially supported (hopefully) and self hostable, but it worked fine for me.

  • I don’t see any problems with that. Even I (and probably most others here), who are FOSS advocates, think Obsidian’s model is fine.

    The devs surely get why FOSS is important, and try their best to match the pros of open source. They even stated that if the company goes bankrupt or they stop developing the app, they’ll open source it.

    One major thing they do absolutely right is how the notes get stored. On other note taking apps, it’s a proprietary database, often “in the cloud”, where your notes get hold hostage. Here, they’re just Markdown files, and the whole thing is pretty open, encouraging a strong community.

    It’s similar to Valve/ Steam. Proprietary, but liked by most Linux people.


  • That’s not what OP was asking for though.

    Why not? In my comment I explained exactly what benefits it would have in this case with a Nvidia GPU. I think it makes sense to at least mention the option.

    OP tried Bazzite and wasn’t the biggest fan of it, but not because it’s image based, no, just because it uses the same Nvidia driver as upstream Fedora.

    They could also have said that they really liked it, who knows?

    And I don’t understand why the Linux user community on Lemmy pushes immutable distros so hard.

    Because they’re awesome? They’re extremely low maintenance, just work (for me), are very robust, offer a lot of choice, and much much more.

    I think they’re very underrated and should be used much more. Sure, some people just don’t like them, but some people would, and those should know this option exists.



  • You could maybe try Bazzite or Aurora/Bluefin.

    They are all Fedora Atomic, the “immutable” Fedora variant, and offer baked in Nvidia support.

    The cool thing is:

    1. If the driver/ Wayland breaks on your install, then it will break on thousands of others simultaneously, and the devs can fix it very very quickly, because every installation is identical.
    2. If it breaks, you can roll back in seconds and keep using the image that still worked yesterday. And in the meantime, the developers are already working on a fix, which takes just hours or a day max.
    3. You don’t have to install and update anything yourself. Just do your computer stuff and stop worrying.
    4. There’s also a GTS (or whatever it’s called) variant around, which is the last major version of Fedora. You won’t get the newest stuff and will be half a year behind in terms of features, but then there won’t be any surprises. I believe the bluefin:gts isn’t around yet, but will come with the next major release.






  • Dumb cloud-only stuff. Good that I use Onshape, where stuff like that could never happen!

    …wait a minute, shit. It absolutely could and probably will. The owners certainly could restrict the free tier or ban my account if they want, and then everything is gone.

    I absolutely hate that. I really like Onshape, because it works great, but we NEED an, at least decent, FOSS option. I don’t necessarily need stuff like flow simulations, just good modeling, like in F360 or Onshape.

    FreeCAD didn’t work too for me. The UI was horrible, the workflow very unintuitive and wonky, and it crashed a lot, while not supporting basic functions.

    There were a few alternatives around too, but they were in the very alpha stage and didn’t work yet at the time I researched.

    I really wish someone would create something from scratch, or fork something that already works, like Blender, and turns it into a CAD.

    It’s just sad to know all my hundreds of models in Onshape will get useless some time in the future.



  • I think you shouldn’t forget that we’re here at c/3dprinting, where only enthusiasts join together. Of course everyone here is a huge fan of 3D printers, those who got frustrated and sold their device aren’t here anymore.

    First of all, I’m very happy about having a printer, but more onto that later.

    I had two ones yet, and both sucked.

    The first was older, shitty and way too big. I wasted many weekends tinkering with that crap, until I accidentally destroyed it and sold it. My second one is the one I still use. It’s a device from China, and the company doesn’t exist anymore. So, if I want to buy replacement parts, I can just pray generic ones fit. And the customer support has always been shit, and the whole company and products seem very wonky in hindsight.

    If I would have to buy another printer, it would definitely be something popular, like a Prusa one. It should be very small, silent and easily repairable. I don’t care anymore about fancy features (maybe except auto leveling), it should just not annoy me.


    Having a printer is like having a drill or soldering iron. You don’t need it daily, but you’re glad that you have it when you need it. And my friends are too! I’m printing more for my family, neighbours and friends than for myself.

    Having a printer without CAD skills is nonsense. But once you can create your own stuff, you have endless capabilities.

    I couldn’t live without one by now.