Lol me when I get a flap of callus on my foot.

Works great as long as you don’t mind not getting paid.

Oh yeah my house is a disaster that works too.

Pfft imagine still thinking waifus that fit entirely within our concept of space-time are hot. 5d waifus are where it’s at.

That’s not better though. You can worship god all you want and he’s not gonna do anything bad because he’s not real. The same can’t be said for Claude. This could have Consequences.

I mean maybe but I would think depression would be more natural. Mania is like increased energy and positive emotions. I feel a bit high.

Can you get me some meds? I think I’m experiencing a manic episode.

Songs from Paul Ryan’s workout playlist

Their weight is so much less that anything without sharp edges would feel comfortable to lie on. We like soft things because they eliminate pressure points, but when the pressure is so much less, everything is as comfortable as a bed.

Thanks. I guess we’ll have to wait for more data to come out to see if the end is a blip or a real change.

With the growing demand of data centers it kinda feels like it will continue to increase.

What’s the last year in this data set?

Broken clock…

Ok. I can see how it’s at least theoretically possible but considering this is just a post about a classic car it doesn’t seem too problematic in this instance. It’s not much different than just seeing a car on the road. I don’t think anyone is hacking into ALPR systems to track down owners of random cars they see whether in person or online.

Well only if you’re a cop or something right?

Can you find someone’s identity from their plates or something?

Voters think that though. Waking them up from the illusion may help.

Plus, honestly, most people drink their own kool aid so I wouldn’t be surprised if our leaders did believe this despite all evidence. The desire to think of yourself as a good person can overpower most evidence.

I think it’s quite a bit more complicated than this. The concept of disposing of something always existed, but for most of human history that meant just leaving waste where it fell or at most tossing it at the edge of the village.

It’s only once larger settlements appeared that a need to concentrate waste in one location to avoid despoiling the entire area became necessary. This was greatly compounded with the invention of manufactured materials that don’t biodegrade like glass and plastic. There was no other solution to this than to concentrate and bury waste so it didn’t end up everywhere.

I’m not pretending anything. All art does consist of ideas. Some also consists of a physical aspect and that physical aspect can be stolen. The intellectual, or idea part cannot be.

You’re the one who tried to move the goalposts to physical media with your museum analogy. So I modified that to make it as close to this situation as possible but still contain the same concepts–making a copy, and then, yes, using it however I wish after the fact. I didn’t spell that out because I thought the point was obvious but sure we can go there too.

I can take my photographs of paintings and put them into AI training data if I want to. The museum is not going to hunt me down for this because again, it obviously harms no one.

But let me make my own analogy here. If I broke into PizzaCake’s house and stole a physical print of this comic, are you asserting that’s the same as me downloading a copy of it here? Let’s say I use them the same way after the fact, for AI or whatever harmless use you find most offensive.

The entire AI industry stands on top of the IP house of cards you are defending far more fundamentally than any need to access data for free. If they were forced to follow copyright law, sure, their training data might get a bit worse, it might cost them a bit more but fundamentally they would continue to do the same things. In contrast, if they didn’t have a monopoly on the product of that training, there would be no profit model for them whatsoever. And you are defending that foundation here, no matter what you may think.

OP chose the title with the subtext in mind.

I can’t believe we’re debating this. The subtext is so obvious. I can’t tell if you people have the reading ability of a literal child or if you simply refuse to acknowledge it because you don’t want to or what?

But what exactly am I telling on here? I think sexual assault is bad and IP laws are bad. That’s no secret.

Well I’ve never heard it before.

Even if it was created by OP that means they understood the message the author is sending loud and clear, even though you refuse to acknowledge it.