

Yeah I think you are right about that.
Yeah I think you are right about that.
Yeah that’s about what I was thinking, thanks. I’m going to ponder it but as I’m relatively privileged it might be worth the risk for me to help my community.
I saw that but I’m just curious to hear other thoughts if there are any.
Are there any legal risks for signing up to this?
There’s an excellent podcast on this project if it interests you.
I find it really hard to give up, personally. If I didn’t fly I would basically never see my family.
Well, you’re denying people certain basic freedoms based on who their parents were. Not all countries provide citizenship based on ancestry, and this means that denying birthright citizenship can lead to statelessness, which is very dangerous for those people. So for them, it is a requirement for a basic and normal life free from state violence.
A nation isn’t a community, at least not in any real, human sense. We barely even know many of our neighbors, let alone those across the country.
The fact that it’s common doesn’t make it right. All of these policies were adopted following the rise of race science, fascism, nationalism, etc. It’s surprising people haven’t started to push back on them more yet.
The way the lake is depicted in the third panel is intended to impart more of a fearful energy I think. So it’s probably the latter.
Is silicone toxic?
No, it’s happening everywhere. But I’ve also seen some significant resistance happening in other cities like NYC, Newark, Portland, Seattle, SF, etc.
I also use Reddit. My local sub can’t be replicated here, unfortunately, and it’s a very valuable resource to know what’s going on in the local community.
Ah it’s been a while I may have misremembered the exact definition.
Caballo, yes. That’s specific to Costa Rica. I forget where I heard the goat one (cabron) but I think it was either Spain or Mexico.
In some Spanish-speaking regions, a goat is usually like a big dumb guy. And calling someone a horse is another way of saying they’re stupid.
Sure but they only want the bots they approve of. That way they can charge for the privilege of allowing someone’s preferred bots onto the platform.
I’ve thought of this years ago. Y’all are just lucky I’m not a terrorist.
I do because I’ve read the research on which it was based. It’s complicated though, you should read the paper.
Does it though?