Try asking in !anime@ani.social
I liked “Spy x Family” and “Little Witch Academia” that could be targetted at similar demographic.
Just one title without specyfing what you liked about it isn’t enough.
A nuclear reactor would be at the top of the list, but it wasn’t as fascinating as Dutch windmill when I was 6 years old.
I didn’t see a bug report for it. Feel free to file one on github.
Very similar to a.gup.pe groups but even more disjointed. It also depends if community has thousands of active users or just a dozen.
I just checked. You can respond if someone mentioned the lemmy community and there is a post on lemmy to respond to and that response will be seen on mastodon.
You can federate and respond but not really follow.
I have only observed Lemmy->Mastodon and Mastodon->Lemmy
If I follow a community, in mastodon it will show as boosts and will show Title + link to the original post with all the comments also as boosts. It has some probability of working. Not always. I couldn’t get hashtags to work.
If someone mentions some lemmy community it will get federated into that community but only into first mentioned community. The first line of a microblog will be set as a title. When users write hashtags and mentions first, it will be unreadable. Not all replies will get federated back and forth.
P.S. I have seen kbin [R.I.P] (Long Live Mbin) posts on lemmy and it worked good
I think more important is compute per watt and idle power consumption than raw max compute power.
Are you using bow drill or flint and steel?
I do not want to get paid to develop mbin.
In couple of years you will burn out doing this for free. Not getting paid opens up the project for another Jia Tan to come along and smuggle malware.
There was recent talk by Rockstar Programmer Dylan Beattie that highlighted this problem. His website https://freeasinweekend.org/ and YT talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzYqxo13I1U
You don’t need to go 100% job or 100% mbin. You could theoretically go for less hours (like Fridays off) to work on mbin.
I know someone that is willing to implement this feature, but they are waiting for merge of rfc to open a Pull Request with initial implementation.
As I understand the RFCs are for defining scope and design requirements for specific feature. And when the design is finalised RFC is merged. Then someone opens a PR to implement it.
If you were imagining some other process it would be beneficial to acknowledge change of development phase from designing to implementing.
P.S. The readme in the repo is supporting my view.
What would need to be done to complete it?
This whole problem would be solved by adding more tags as per this proposal: https://github.com/LemmyNet/rfcs/pull/4 and enabling more filtering.
but @dessalines@lemmy.ml and @nutomic@lemmy.ml didn’t look at it for months and I don’t know what is their stance on it. The dev that wanted to implement it doesn’t want to spend energy to push forward for a green light.
The summer thread: https://sh.itjust.works/post/22414971
not linux but you can find something