It’s a more complicated version of that feature where Gmail offers suggested responses like “let me look into that” and “thank you.”
It’s a more complicated version of that feature where Gmail offers suggested responses like “let me look into that” and “thank you.”
“Use a Tardiss, Ivanova!” Sisko declared calmly.
She was a journalist who used the Panama Papers to expose high level corruption in Malta. Galizia did not break the Panama Papers story, she’s impressive enough without people making stuff up about her.
Sort of. The “pod” bit is from the iPod, the “cast” is definitely as you say.
Every instance gets to decide on its own, there’s no set of rules governing the whole thing. That’s why I stated this is my opinion, not some hard and fast rule.
So your argument is if the regulation isn’t perfectly applied to every possible instance of a potential violation simultaneously, then it should never be applied? How does that make any sense?
For example, I’m personally of the opinion that instances should be allowed to federate until they prove themselves to be bad actors, but in Meta’s case there’s a lot of existing evidence that shows they shouldn’t be allowed to federate in the first instance.
GBR Spider-Man