Shit tool if it doesn’t do what you tell it to do
RaivoKulli
KulliRaivo
- 0 Posts
- 28 Comments
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzto Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•I would still download a car if I could. 🚗English3·1 day agoThanks for your service
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•People who don't live in a jurisdiction with unconditional *jus soli*, would you be in support of unconditional *jus soli* in your country? Why or Why not?3·2 days agoThe US was never specified here so I didn’t know it was the expected topic
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•People who don't live in a jurisdiction with unconditional *jus soli*, would you be in support of unconditional *jus soli* in your country? Why or Why not?3·2 days agoRemoving? We never had birthright citizenship.
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•why are website language switchers in the current language?3·2 days agoI mean if it was done accidentally then the sheer shitshowyness of that blunder would be pretty funny to me
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzto Technology@lemmy.world•Meta said it supports proposals for an EU-wide age of digital adulthood, below which minors would need parental consent to use social mediaEnglish1·2 days agoI thought that’s exactly how the porn age check is going to work
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•People who don't live in a jurisdiction with unconditional *jus soli*, would you be in support of unconditional *jus soli* in your country? Why or Why not?2·3 days agoNo. Because I don’t think citizenship is solely about what plot of land you are born on.
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•why are website language switchers in the current language?4·3 days agoProbably not so funny other way around hah
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What's the most visually appealing phone you've had so far?2·6 days agoThe Nokia “fashion” line had some interesting designs
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What's the most visually appealing phone you've had so far?1·6 days agoAh the soap boxes
I’m not sure what the math is behind it but if it works it works ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I was just saying that NATO countries haven’t been attacked by Russia whereas non-NATO countries have, so it might be that the membership has maybe something to do with it.
I thought it was a simple point but you’ve since brought up genetics and good and evil into it, which honestly surprises me since I don’t know where you got any of that
I don’t know how you got from countries and military alliances into genetic traits to attack other countries. Pretty big leap imo.
I’ve heard some .ml people call NATO a virus but I didn’t think it was literal
I was just saying that none of the members have got attacked by Russia and quite a few of the non-members have. Might be an indication of something. Not sure where you got genetics from tbh.
It doesn’t matter that Russia hasn’t attacked NATO countries but it has and currently is attacking non-NATO countries? Interesting take
Breaking News: Local Lemming Discovers Speech
You’ve quite rudely ignored my question even though I promptly answered yours.
They wanted to prevent them from joining because they couldn’t bully them if they managed to join. I think that answers for both.
Now your turn to answer my original question, please.
How many of their NATO neighbors have they attacked vs their non-NATO neighbors? There’s a reason countries want to join it lol
Even worse if the tool refuses to do what you tell it to