Slashdot? Fark? BBSes? Smoke signals?

Why do that using unkillable things

Why

I actually think they’re “too small”. Didn’t they shrink the size sometime after that dude broke the bulletproof window? I swear it was bigger on that demo.

If the camera system + software results in being 1% safer than a human, and a given human can’t afford the lidar version, society is still better off with the human using the camera-based FSD than driving manually. Elon being a piece of shit doesn’t detract from this fact.

But, yes, a lot of “ifs” in there, and obviously he did this to cut costs or supply chain or blahblah

Lidar or other tech will be more relevant once we’ve raised the floor (everyone getting the additional safety over manual driving) and other FSDs become more mainstream (competition)

I wear many hats. You failed, BTW.

Explain your methodology for posting this post, including any edits made to the original post.

… or use Firefox and migrate their bookmarks.

Can we ban bot-posted articles with incomplete body text?

I prefer to reduce demand, instead. Everyday people who feel happy and safe don’t feel the need to be violent.

Far-cry-blood-dragon-wave

Eight HOURS?!

Just because it’s possible, doesn’t mean it’s common.

It’s hard to convince tech people to be activists. There’s this other term, in between bougie and proletariat that classifies the people in between. Something like, the people who have it just good enough to not give a shit.

And that’s like all of tech.

They’re not selling the copy, bruh. They’re selling a technology that very few understand. Smart people pretend they get it, but they don’t. That’s how rare the math is.

Whatever happened to copying isn’t stealing?

I think the crux of the conversation is whether or not the world is better with ChatGPT. I say yes. We can tackle the disinformation in another effort.

Make your account on the porn instance and let them block you! Galaxy brain.

But that’s on the LLM side not the bot side.

The dog counts. You’re a DINKWAD instead.