i’m not sure if i would be willing to lose sleep over a 4 hour mario kart video. now a 4 hour video about invisible walls in mario 64? that’s a different story

is diplomacy an option?

dead souls style invasions

christmas wouldn’t be christmas without 42 geese

🤬🤬🤬

best self defense mechanism there is

as long as you remember to like and subscribe that should be okay

all it takes

i cannot tell you how deeply validating it is to find a video like this. i have been waiting for something like for a while

this is one of the reasons i hate the phrase “content creator”. it’s so generic and vague. the word “content” sounds very corporate to me. saying “content” instead of “video” feels like saying “guest” instead of “customer”, but also worse somehow. it feels like a corporate way of companies trying to distance themselves a bit from the things they actually do, while also speaking in the most general/ambiguous way possible.

this was also me in my 20s when someone asked if i wanted to go out drinking

always remember, <=> is the three-way comparison operator. it takes two arguments.

what about haskell

Treat OR NO Trick

who’s sister?

no not like that

that’s what they tell you right before throwing you off the plane

There is only two ways to protect a game against piracy, right? Either you don’t, or use our protection

this is the most denuvo quote i could possibly think of. it’s beyond parody, and yet, they went and said it anyway

i think you’re taking that quote out of context a bit. a few sentences later, the article says

Even physicians have weighed in on the shortcomings of B.M.I. The American Medical Association warned last year that B.M.I. is an imperfect metric that doesn’t account for racial, ethnic, age, sex and gender diversity. It can’t differentiate between individuals who carry a lot of muscle and those with fat in all the wrong places.

“Based on B.M.I., Arnold Schwarzenegger when he was a bodybuilder would have been categorized as obese and needing to lose weight,” said Dr. Wajahat Mehal, director of the Metabolic Health and Weight Loss Program at Yale University.

so the point they seem to be making is that, while BMI is controversial partly because people like to shoot the messenger, it’s also just not a reliable measurement in a medical context, even as a heuristic. the article also goes into more detail on its other shortcomings as well. the article also indicates how BMI was never intended to be used in a medical context. so, there are plenty of valid reasons for wanting a new metric.

but i do think the sentence you quoted isn’t really doing the author any favors in terms of trying to communicate the central point of the article.

in my defense, your honor, i didn’t think anybody would actually fall for it