Yup, it works great. I actually did it myself when migrating from a centos to debian host. Worked first try, no issues (except one thing that was already broken but I didn’t know because I hadn’t accessed it recently). Containers are great for this.

This. Cloud-init, or autoinstall for Ubuntu, to get the install done, then use ansible for anything more.

Bind mounts. I’ve never bothered to figure out named volumes, since I often work with the contents outside Docker. Then I just back up the whole proxmox VM. (Yes I’m aware proxmox supports containers, no I don’t plan to convert, that’s more time and effort for no meaningful gain to me.)

You can restore that backup to a new VM. I just make sure it boots and I can access the files. Turn off networking before you boot it so that it doesn’t cause conflicts.

Yes, but I wouldn’t bother bringing it up to them. It’s fine if they want to provide it under multiple licenses. Since they make it available under the GPL, you can do those things under that license.

If they do change something, it will probably be to change the license away from GPL.

Being a YouTube personality is enough justification for me.

I don’t think you’ve looked closely enough at China, then.

“I don’t know how to run a shop, but it can’t be that hard, let’s just have AI do it!”

For a first pass, yes. I wouldn’t really trust it for an unbiased, objective perspective. Each model is only as good as its training data.

When did they ever? I remember when one of my parents got fired in the 90s, they sent the stuff from the desk in a box. Including the company desk phone!

The issue is not encryption, it’s the unauthenticated API. People can interact with your server without an account.

Apparently I can’t read

Loops?

The DJ is the artist. Each set is an album with one track. What’s broken about that?

Most devs are shit at their jobs.

Not that this is exclusive to devs. Most people in general are shit at their jobs.

It could run entirely on-device.

I saw one of their Jeff Goldblum ads within the past week, so they’re still airing.

I don’t know anyone that seriously uses it. The only posts I see are corporate PR and LinkedIn “Agree?” lunatics.

Jellyfin should be fine. Why do you say it breaks it?

It’s a valid argument, but it’s not supported by their actions, which are demonstrably exploitative.

And not really comparable to rape, especially child rape, due to consent obviously; there is no non-exploitative form of that. Sex work is work, but children can never give informed consent, and even adult sex tourism is almost always exploitative.

No. Most cameras have filters to cut non-visible light.

And any EM that passes through a mask is probably going to pass through flesh too. And any EM that’s transmitted and not reflected means it can’t be imaged by a sensor.

Very thin fabric, like a thin white T-shirt, can be transparent to IR in bright sunlight. But that’s a fairly rare case.