the thumbnail looked like a tornado behind a skyscraper.
the thumbnail looked like a tornado behind a skyscraper.
chickens are sentient, sapient creatures! Their experiences are real and matter. Their suffering is identical in nature to your own.
do you have evidence for the sapient claim? and what is the basis of whether their experiences matter: how much, and to whom? and as for the identical-ness of the nature of their suffering, can you substantiate that in any way?
I haven’t found a compelling reason to do it
a bit overwrought
you seem to understand that I was right, you were wrong, and you are making a weaker claim.
I like the militant ones. it’s the ones that can’t stop spreading mistruths like evangelicals that bother me.
exploiting and killing trillions of sentient beings just so you can have five minutes of mouth pleasure
no one does that
you’re wrong on the facts, this has nothing to do with supporting corporations.
i’m principled, so i know that copying content is good and stopping people from copying is bad.
no, it doesn’t.
plagiarism isn’t a tort.
Thousands of hours of work on a project you completed being used by someone else to turn a profit, maybe even used in some way you vehemently disagree with, without giving you a dime is
exactly how human culture progresses, and trying to stop it
is unethical and needs regulation from that perspective.
Taking other people’s creative works to create your own for-profit product is illegal in every way except when AI does it.
wrong.
this has nothing to do with net neutrality
I’m not responsible for the decisions of other people.
Your action led to a dead cow in the future.
Does that work?
no, that’s not causal. but even if it were, it doesn’t make me responsible for the killing of the plants or animals in the past.
the company has to produce now to replace the one you bought.
no, they don’t. they could choose not to do that. I am not responsible for their choices.
You shouldn’t need your hand held for this, it’s pretty basic stuff.
this is just posturing. it doesn’t support your (erroneous) claim, nor does it undermine my (obviously correct) position.
bye