The theory makes you understend why a method works for a certain problem. A lot of exams try to trick the taker by giving problems that are almost solvable with just the toolbox but need a bit extra trick to solve which theory can help. But there again i find that simply knowing the specific trick is enough to do well.

But personally believing that is in any way important to succeed in exams has lead me to waste too much time. If you find that you have prepared well enough to solve any problems across math for an exam, it would then be ok to then cover the theory.

So in essence, just keep doing what you’re doing.

How your comment reads to the rest of us:

"Wrong reason people don’t like twitter - bad

Wrong reason people like lemmy - good

You both sound the same to me"

Eh? What’s this bold assumption that people would like this “feature” if fedora introduced it?

Here’s why:

Boards of directors are CEOs of other companies that are buddies of the CEO of the company they are directors of. This is like a shitty musical chair of board of directors.

It’s not quite equivalent right? Using an existing plant is cheaper and faster than building a new one?

Its like saying a datacenter is not financially viable only because top brass decided to use a perfectly good existing one.