azuth

As long as a standard “unblessed” usb-c cable will work fully with the phone it’s non-issue.

It doesn’t really challenge the desktop CPU in multithreaded tests where the 170w are actually relevant.

The test also includes AI tasks, the Apple chip seems to spend around 20% of real estate on that, the desktop CPU had none.

“Generative” is not a thing in copyright law.

You regard them as different to tools like Word. That does not exist in the law.

When you originally posted that they OpenAI should be on the hook I thought you meant they were the ones commiting copyright infringement. Not that they would violate private contracts with their customers.

Private agreements is not my business.

There is however a push by both sides to settle this in law. Whatever happens will affect everyone.

Yes they do.

Which is why you want an agreement to make them liable for copyright infringement (plagiarism is not a crime itself).

You would have to pay for distributing copyright infringing material whether created by AI or humans or just straight up copied.

I don’t care if AI will be used,commercially or otherwise.

I am worried about further limitations being placed upon the general public (not “creatives”/publishers/AI corps) either by reinterpretation of existing laws, amendment of existing laws or legislation of brand new rights (for copyright holders/creators, not the general public).

I don’t even care who wins, the “creatives” or tech/AI, just that we don’t get further shafted.

You need a very specific prompt to make a copy. Even to just be similar enough you have to put the proper input and try a lot of repetitions.

That’s why the right holders are going after the training which included copying by the AI corpos.

In your dream land right holders could just prompt the AI till it spit something close to their work and sue the AI corp for that. Repeat as needed ; infinite money glitch.

Obviously it doesn’t work that way.

Neither are AI vendors. We have locally hosted AI models and they don’t contain what they output. You can tell by the actual size.

Nope. The output is based on the users input in both cases.

It’s not stealing, its not even ‘piracy’ which also is not stealing.

Copyright laws need to be scaled back, to not criminalize socially accepted behavior, not expand.

Operating system have been used to commit copyright infringement much more effectively and massively by copying copyrighted material verbatim.

OS vendors are not liable, the people who make and distribute the copies are. The same applies for Word processors, image editors etc.

You are for a massive expansion on the scope of copyright limiting the freedoms of the general public not just AI corps or tech corps.

It’s not a breach of copyright or other IP law not to cite sources on your paper.

Getting your paper rejected for lacking sources is also not infringing in your freedom. Being forced to pay damages and delete your paper from any public space would be infringement of your freedom.

The decision is that even lending out ebooks against owned copies is illegal

What the IA may be illegal but is certainly not wrong.

I remember an Apple fanboy arguing that this made things better!

When you use a hotspot from your phone the site/peers/whatever sees an IP that your ISP has assigned to you and could share that with authorities etc.

When you use a WiFi they see an IP assigned to the owner of the WiFi.

Security wise its easier for others in the WiFi to try and fuck with your computer since you are on the same LAN.

So it depends on what you fear the most.

So Mexican authorities should stop enforcing the law?

Do you think that in order to deliver him to the US he didn’t commit multiple crimes? Should Mexico grant him amnesty?

You don’t have to deal with digital ownership bullshit with existing physical media because some people broke the DRM.

The worst development for end users would be a normalization of physical media and new or (“updated”) physical formats and players.

With brand new DRM and more tightly controlled playback devices.

I don’t know about Italian but I can tell you Greek Americans plainly can’t speak Greek.

Same with ‘ethnic’ cuisine, they don’t put lettuce in “Greek” salad because that’s how it was originally but because that’s what was available and accepted in the US.

Its also far more likely that very regional or even just family traditions/customs/recipes got attributed to whole nations rather than an elite managing to wipe it out from the original group.

Most fruits are low calorie with a lot of them having less than 100 kcal per 100g. There are some exceptions such as Avocado (due to fat content actually) and dates as well dried fruit (prunes at 300/100g vs plums at 45/100g).

Strawberries, cherries, apples, figs, bananas all are below 100kcal/100g. Obviously some are better at filing you up than others.

They would drop tactical nukes on NATO forces.

It’s never going to happen anyways.

Why won’t they get a virus or something on Windows 10 with that same hardware?

It should then refrain from from posting on non US-media sources and/or stories and/or communities.

Of course it won’t. It’s purpose is to promote it’s owners US-centric political window.

It’s spamming political propaganda ,dressing it up as ‘facts’, and it’s getting it’s just deserts.