I don’t have an explicit config file no, I don’t remember needing it before though. I’ve followed the steps https://docs.gitea.com/installation/install-with-docker which worked with gitea but doesn’t work with forgejo. I didn’t see anything that mentioned needing a config for the first method listed there at least. I suppose I could try some of the other methods listed there but I liked option A the best generally.

Logs for what the container?

I did check that first after a lot of googling and I think everything is all set there

Ok. The issues lies somewhere in the actual connection. Adding ssh keys to my instance shows up properly in the known keys. Whenever I attempt to connect either on the actual server itself as a test or via trying to clone over ssh or even connect via ssh itself I get public key denials. If you want I can provide you my ssh config on server, my docked compose file, the verbose output of the ssh connections in various facets although they haven’t appeared to be very helpful, or whatever else can be helpful

Edit would someone like to enlighten me why they’re randomly downvoting this? Would you all have preferred I just dumped logs? I genuinely don’t understand. My main question was actually whether there is a difference between gitea and forgejo since I’ve already verified this exact setup worked there. So if anything an answer to my original question would require 0 input from me. I do appreciate the help from everyone but to say that me saying “it doesn’t work” is unhelpful is missing the point

I honestly prefer googles new ui right now. Liquid Glass on Mac feels decent though.

Uhh Valnet did what now?

Fair points. I disagree that 5E isn’t ideal for this game specifically. Other systems are quite complex to implement in a game so less accessible. Imagine all the people who struggle with the 5e rules trying to play the game in pathfinder. I don’t play 5e anymore but I think it’s pretty decent for a crpg. I can agree that the writing isn’t perfect though. The character writing and such is quite good but the overall main plot is a bit weak I suppose. Sure there are parts of it that could be better but I don’t see why it shouldn’t be called one of the greatest games. It’s accessible for normie non crpg players, the characters are fun, there’s lots of choices and unlike say a Bethesda game they actually matter lol.

Somewhat unrelated how do you feel about divinity if you’ve played it in comparison to bg3? Do you think some of the issues with bg3 might be due to using existing IP if you like divinity better?

What makes you say BG3 is overrated? I totally understand it’s not necessarily for everyone, but it’s basically without peer in the genre if you’re huge into that style of game like I am. Now admittedly a component of why people say it’s so good is that Larian has had amazing community engagement so I guess that could be an argument. I do wish that Act 3 had gotten the more content they were thinking of but it’s better that they’ve had so much attention to detail I mean I’m not sure there’s a game that comes close in terms of how many choices you get to make.

Huh does that actually work?

Edit: I realize it probably should given my understanding of tokenization but if it’s training data couldn’t it easily be replaced with like a regex or something?

Can someone explain why so many people use thorns everywhere?