And how long are those systems expected to last compared to those in the article?

Like suodiu, but gold.

Why does it matter that Altman fails when there are so many other companies waiting to take their place?

Implying that the only way to use LLMs is with 0 human oversight.

It would also apply to child labour and slavery. We may have outlawed it locally, but that doesn’t change the fact that companies who make use of it will be at an advantage, so we just ended up outsourcing it.

The biggest strength of LLMs is in processing a huge amount of text very quickly. I imagine that contributes a lot to military intelligence.

Twitch is owned by Amazon

OP is asking how to solve a problem. You understand that repeating the problem does not answer the question, right?

I don’t understand where this question is coming from. The premise of this question is that “literally” is ambiguous. That its meaning is unclear. How does an ambiguous word add clarity to a sentence?

Obviously, you use the word that expresses what you intend to express. The question is what that word would be when you want to express “literally” in the strict dictionary definition sense without ambiguity.

I’m hoping that it’ll be able to work well as a portable workstation for coding and whatnot.

You know of a word that satisfies OP’s criteria and you’re not going to share it?

It seems more likely to me that any bugs present in that code just became features that old software relied upon over time, so they can’t change anything without breaking backward compatibility.

So I guess, in a sense, it’s bug-free.

LLMs are still a facet of AI though. It sounds like they’re saying it shouldn’t be categorized as AI at all.

Or any task change really. You tell me that I’m here for a writing task, then halfway through it becomes a math test? There’s no way I’m doing anywhere near as well as if they told me what was happening ahead of time.

Which is a fair claim to make. I don’t know why you went with “EV batteries aren’t safe over 40⁰C”, which is clearly False based on the source you cited, then went on a whole roundabout talking about how it’s not safe at 45C, then 70C, then how active cooling is inefficient while citing the efficiency of Peltier devices. Your top-level comment was fine. Nothing else you said after that made any sense.

A quick lesson on logical reasoning:

If you want to show that a piece of technology A is inefficient and you know that another piece of tech B is more efficient, then you can use the inefficiency of B as evidence for the inefficiencies of A. Basically, for some inefficiency threshold T where any value above T is poor efficiency, then A>B and B>T means that A>T.

Here, we’re comparing vapour-compression (A) and solid state (B) heat pumps. Solid states are much more inefficient. So you have A<B and B>T. You can’t use this to make any claims about the relationship between A and T.

Did you even read the link you sent us?

Max 60°C: Continuous high temperature use will accelerate battery aging and capacity decay. If the temperature exceeds 70°C, the risk of thermal runaway will increase dramatically.

It makes more sense if you read the context. They’re responding to a comment that said this:

I guess you don’t understand active cooling then. If the coolest air in front of you is ~160⁰F, well that’s the coolest your batteries are gonna get, at best. Which is way hotter than rated temperatures for lithium batteries…

A response that says “it’s not X” can be interpreted as “it’s not doing the thing you said it’s doing”. In this case, over_clox is saying that heat transfers directly from the battery to the air.

Acceptable range: 0°C to 45°C (32°F to 113°F). Below 10°C, the charging rate may be limited. It is recommended to charge the battery at 0~10°C and 0.2C rate. Above 45°C, there is a risk of battery charging.

Eh?

Above 45°C, there is a risk of battery charging.

???