

You can absolutely fail to disabuse people of incorrect notions for malicious reasons.


You can absolutely fail to disabuse people of incorrect notions for malicious reasons.
I think “temps” would be a good word for this. As in “works as a temp worker”.


SA means Sexual Assault
Didn’t you just post something with the opposite message, not even a month ago?


“You can’t punish the voters for the things the people they voted for did!”
Do you have a source for this that isn’t an easily-generatable png? I’m having trouble finding it.


It’s horribly inefficient. I refuse to use it!
They should get one! That’s a very normal thing for a library to have.


“If we don’t flood the front page with Nazi stuff, we’re as bad as the Nazis” was always my least favorite argument.


I firmly disagree. “The way to stop Nazism is to let them talk more and let more people see a bunch of Nazi stuff” can be judged as nonsense by inspection.
“Should”? Hell no. “Do”? Yes, all of them, all the time, no matter whether I know about it or not.
Good lord, please lead with that in the future! Censorship is much more convincing than “there’s an account I don’t like”!
Do you have a more convincing argument for Bluesky being a “Nazi platform” than “a government organization opened an account”? Because they could literally open a Lemmy account tomorrow on whatever server.
“If I can’t spam your home screen with sex jokes, that’s called censorship”
I dislike that the chemical formula for progesterone provided here is ambiguous; there are plenty of molecules with that formula as written.