Someone has to pay for that work. Either volunteers are donating their time, corporations “donate” work of their employees or hire it out because use of the project generates profits for them and they recognize not everyone can be a parasite (The FOSS model)

The other alternative is users paying directly.

If you want to use a closed source os, then pay for updates or you will be monetized on other ways. (In the case of MS that would be ads or the OS is just an incidental product used to drive sales of software or cloud computing)

A subscription for continued support seems fair. (If there are no ads).

I know. I meant switch back to signal if signal added official support.

This is the way. I might be open to switch back if they [signal] added [official] support for unified push, though

Meanwhile Australia is going to fore carriers to disconnect customers with devices that are not guaranteed to support emergency calling over volte. As there are still unsolved problems with detecting that, the providers fall back to only allowing devices they provided themselves.

Middle man tls.

And that is why I pay for my own domain. The service can change, but my domain is eternal (or near enough for my purposes)

I wonder how fast a turnaround would really be. Can all the checks be run on the launchpad and how likely are repairs that cannot be done there?

Some do detect open developer tools and nuke the whole page, though.

vodozemac might become that proven implementation. Without reinventing the wheel there will never be an alternative, because everyone just reuses the one existing library.

The VPN is really not much more than white labelled mullvad + the browser extension with separate VPN servers per container.

The experimental AI programme is more expensive than the traditional course? What are they thinking?

The AI will be called GLaDOS

Archiving might be allowed even now, but not with a public download library.

Some datahoarder probably has an offline copy.

I’d argue that is still an issue of trust, but maybe more concerning society / the local neighborhood.

Currently, cloudstrike offers two methods for Linux: a kernel driver / module and a theoretically safer alternative using epbf (you could call that “kernel level scripting”). Ironically, they triggered a kernel bug using that second option. They did not test all kernels they listed as compatible or something like that.

Or some network settings are not in the new “sinple” ui.

deleted by creator

Passkeys do one thing right. They are based on asymmetric keys as a proof of knowledge instead of transmitting the password.