Wtf is a lowes?

It is working as designed, since it is meant to discourage people from voting. The less voter participation the better results for Republicans.

Utter whiny nonsense. Respect has to be earned. You can get tolerance though, as long as you aren’t harming anyone.

I think Hanlons razor is in desperate need of an update, since its premise seems to be based entirely on naivity. These days everything happening on the internet seems more like: “Never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by malice”.

To be fair GTA VI is probably not coming to PC this decade.

Twitter was always bad. It is of course way worse now, but it is silly to have any nostalgic and reverential feelings for it.

Beans are native to Europe.

Well then I guess I need a new vehicle because I’m a handyman and I use a truck.

Yes, yes you do.

He is not concerned about the population, he is concerned about not having enough young men to send off to war.

If that is the only place you have seen Christopher Walken, then you seriously need to update yourself on Christopher Walken movies. He is great in everything he is in, and you are missing out on a legend of a man.

Sure thing, Musk.

Removed by mod

It is funny how easy it is to spot monolingual Americans attempting to write like non-native English speakers.

How about adressing the issue instead of just cresting strawmen about the messengers?

This feature is an actual fundamrntal privacy issue.

Where is “here”?

It seems to me that the major issue people were complaining about was the thing even existing in the first place (and rightly so). So by them still wanting to implement it, they have fixed absolutely nothing.

This argument keeps missing that it is not only the quality but mainly the quantity of fakes which is going to be the problem. The complete undermining of trust in photographic evidence is seen as a good thing for so many nefarious vested interests, that this is an aim they will actively strive for.

It is the quantity of fakes because of the easy process which is going to be the problem. Fake pictures will very soon outnumber real, and the amount of them will still kerp grjwing exponentially even after that.

The thing is that in the future the mere quantity of fakes will make the careful vetting process you describe physically impossible. You will be bombarded with high quality fakes to such an extent that you will simply have to give up trying to keep up, so it will be a choice of either dropping the vetting process or dropping bringing any pictures altogether. For profit driven corporate jwbed media outlets, the choice unfortunately will be obvious.

Yeah, it is going to be mainly a quantity issue rather than a quality one. The quality of faked photos has already been high since photoshop. Now a constant growing avalanche of high quality fakes (produced by all sorts of different vested interests with their own particular purposes) is going to barrage us on a daily basis, simply because it is cheap and easy