He hath not failed to pester us with message

Yet nothing he said is untrue

Macklemore is not the best messenger on this, but who is without sin?

deleted by creator

I think it’s the other way around. They said we need to slow down AI so this story is now being told

I find this kind of response insufferable. It shifts the conversation from a systems critique to personal responsibility. You could have posted this in response the OP, and it would be equally on point and useless.

I have personalized ads turned of in YouTube and it seems half the ads are for gambling as of late.

Reminds me of something Alok said about playbooks: we focus on the books but forget to play.

I mean ICE is both a joke and a scary brute squad.

And anyone who has a retirement holding index funds is also complicit?

How dare you have a healthy response to this garbage

No, but Milo threatened his friends to not defend him less they be a target of a harassment campaign.

That’s a distinction without a difference. The machine doing the inference is not the same machine doing the learning. From the perspective of the machine doing LLM inference, it could not tell you if the table was hand rolled by a human, fitted using ML or just a table of random noise.

Technically right in that it doesn’t necessarily translate audio into text, but that’s hardly the point. The point is someone gives the LLM a giant table that directs its response.

I think you grasp the point, it is exactly what an LLM does

Being critAI is being proAI.

Makes me wonder why we even bother with burying radioactive waste.

Someone give this person a congressional hearing and billions of dollars to burn

It’s what follows the signifiers that’s the tell

Yes, using the word “capitalism” is a signifier, but I wouldn’t say it’s counterproductive. Based on a person’s response you can quickly conclude whether they have the historical context to understand the critique. Defining capitalism as “a market-based” system is ahistorical , markets existed before capitalism. It is very hard to surface the critique while also writing a wall of text that describes how capitalism came to be and how it was later moderated