I was looking at Graphite Editor project and how the hell is 24k stars on GitHub translate to 600$ per month?

This is not the first open source project that I see with this problem.

Why the hell is no one supporting open source developers?

  • Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    23 days ago

    Very few OF models earn anywhere close to that.

    The average OF model gets $130 a month. The top 1% of OF models get $50k a year.

    The ones you’re thinking of earning tens of thousands/millions a month are the top 0.1%

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Yep, same with any kind of influencer or youtuber or anything close to that.

      For every person you see or hear about making thousands or tens of thousands of dollars a month… there are a hundred thousand people making basically nothing.

      … And also a lot of ‘influencer’ type people are just lying about everything, its all rentals, credit cards, and many of them don’t even know they need to file and pay taxes on income from content.

      The algorithm just tends to only or mostly show you the most popular people… so you mostly only see the top 0.1% of people, but you see them all the time.

      Its basically a casino + societal level gaslighting.

      The more honest influencers who are quite popular will just straight up tell you they got lucky, randomly boosted by the algorithm at some point, and they were able to expand on that.

      But without that luck, you more or less never get super popular, or it takes a solid decade of consistent effort.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    Also, it’s a huge myth (marketing lie) that the average OF model is making any appreciable money.

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 days ago

        Well, it’s a graph showing the bottom 50% of OF accounts. The horizontal axis is the monthly earnings in USD, and the vertical axis shows the frequency of people earning earning that amount.

        Context is that it is a sampling of OnlyFans accounts.

        You can see that the median OF creator is earning under $200 /month and the modal creator is earning $0 per month.

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        The context is in the fucking graph mate, it’s literally all there, you just need to learn reading comprehension

        The source is directly from OF data, which is publicly shared every now and again

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    23 days ago

    The average earnings per month on onlyfans is something like $3 a month, most people doing that are not making millions, those are outliers.

    I would bet AVERAGE earnings for developers are the same or higher.

  • Signtist@bookwyr.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    If you’re seriously asking that, then you need to actually look at the world and the people in it, and make more realistic expectations based on what you see. People pay significantly more time and money on what makes them feel good than what they know is good for them. It’s one of the most basic obvious truths of humanity.

    Sure, some people focus enough on logic or have enough willpower to do what’s good for them, but when you get a huge group of people together, those individuals fade into the mindless crowd.

    Humanity isn’t going to suddenly do what it needs to do simply because it’s necessary, no matter how much we might hope it will. Like a child who doesn’t want to eat their vegetables, humanity needs an authority figure to coerce it into doing what needs to be done, whether that be a governmental body, a revolutionary, or some other figure or organization. They simply operate on their most basic desires otherwise.

    • clif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      23 days ago

      What if we mash them together? Streaming nude live FOSS coding with subscription fees and tips.

      Only downside is that no one wants to see me do that so there’s not much of a market…

      • Sergio@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        I have the perfect solution. HINT: “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!”

  • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Because the developers aren’t equivalent to OnlyFans models.
    OnlyFans models are for-profit business owners using OnlyFans as infrastructure, not employees or volunteers.

    So you’d have to compare their profits with for-profit business owners using opensource software as infrastructure.
    Examples of those are Red Hat, Canonical, Broadcom, Microsoft, Apple, etc.

    • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      But aren’t they all running on open source infrastructure? Well, except for the ones who’ve undergone cosmetic surgery

  • Bongles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    23 days ago

    Because I’m not jerkin it to Graphite Editor.

    But if i want see a specific OF models big honkin bazookas, somebody has to pay them.

  • Cherry@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    23 days ago

    You could go join only fans. Show your assets. Let some old guy or girl leer at you. Maybe let him pay you for sex. Totally your right. Has to be better than being a dev right?

    Point being look at the rational and objective responses here. For years there has been the industry of sex and some people make money some are taken advantage of. Have you ever watched free porn? Someone and their body were likely taken advantage of that and you benefitted. If the answer is yes then you have pretty much invalidated your own question.

    You have the right to provide your services as a dev or displaying your body. Being sanctimonious about the $$$ involved is a shallow argument.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    23 days ago

    So your question is “why do people spend more money on sexual gratification than on being fair?”

    I don’t even know where to start with that one, but the question suggests extreme naivety.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        Yeah probably. Someone just responded to me with some incel bullshit and I doubt they’re alone.

    • kittykillinit@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      23 days ago

      I think it has more to do with how open source developers work considerably harder than onlyfans whores yet get paid significantly less, if they make any money at all.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        Ah so we’ve come out and said the incel shit out loud. I appreciate the candor, even if it is absolutely disgusting.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                23 days ago

                Maybe you can explain why sex workers are subhuman? How about that? Let’s see how many friends you win from expanding on this.

                • kittykillinit@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  When did I say they are subhuman? If you can’t read then it’s understandable why you’re confused.

                • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  It’s obvious that you’ve already decided that you “know” what the person you’re arguing with means and think, and then you’re attacking that instead of recognising that you’ve misunderstood them.

  • nothingworked@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    for every OF model earning thousands there are thousands who get close to 0 there are open source projects which earn millions in non direct way

  • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    How does my Strawman I invented to make my point sound better that doesn’t even slightly reflect reality earn thousands and in some cases millions per month, but this perfect idealist saviour complex I’ve invented earn less than 1000$ per month?

    OP, right now