Another angle:

  • toynbee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Regardless of “can” or “can’t,” I wouldn’t stand on a modern balcony that had passed inspection at that height, let alone a crumbly unsecured hole that has made no promise to maintain its integrity. Even if there were hypothetically no risk, I see no rail or even, like, a cable.

    A strong gust of wind or particularly intrusive thought could easily ruin one or more lives there.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are fewer of them than there could have been. Regulations are written in the blood of our citizens.

        • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Every single modern safety regulation is because someone died, or at least was seriously injured, doing exactly what the rule tells you not to do.

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Knowing a construction worker’s usual sense of humor, I’d be afraid of one giving the guy sitting next to them a solid slap on the back as a joke. Especially if they had just expressed a fear of heights.

      • toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, and I don’t share their sensibilities.

        Just this photo makes me want to hide somewhere very close to the ground, maybe even under.

        • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d like to see the rest of a zoomed out perspective. There is a chance it’s above a other floor. And it’s really only like 13 feet up

          • toynbee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Maybe, but it seems unlikely that any kind of aircraft would be flying that low through a populous area.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            A 13 foot drop is still easily enough to kill you. People have died from only a 6 foot drop.

            • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh sure! But the survival of a 13ft drop is wayyyyyyyyy greater than almost hitting terminal velocity and landing on concrete below.