cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/54234120

the left image is of a native port recompiled for PC, and the right one is an emulator being developed to run Switch 2 games

  • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I wouldn’t personally call Nintendo a ‘hardware company’

    They make innovative hardware and bundle it up with games that use the capabilities well. I think Nintendo would consider themselves an end-to-end experience company. And they can’t do that if they lose control of the ecosystem by letting other people run their own software on it.

    I said that BOTW was a "system seller’’ and I meant that, but not in the sense that the end goal was to sell the console.

    No. The goal of big first-party games like Zelda - which always happen to come out for new console launch time - is to make people own the console so once they have it, they buy more games for it. That’s the long-term money. Twenty games over five years and every cent through their ecosystem.

    Nintendo don’t want to sell you open hardware, and they never will.

    • Unique_Emerald_Sol_I@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      A description I heard from Conrad Zimmerman that I think is apt is that Nintendo is a toy company. They largely aren’t following the tactics of the other big movers in the gaming space because their strategy is fundamentally different.