'We support the work of those who are trying to limit the harm generative AI is doing to videogames and our world, and apologise that Big Walk’s LLM usage may not meet their standards'
Remember, this Big Walk scenario specifically isn’t about Steam disclosure or the wider debate on what “AI use” in code/game dev is or if that use is ethical/acceptable. The IGF’s rules for award eligibility do define chatbot-assisted troubleshooting as AI use, and that “AI use” means ineligibility for the award.
By the rules of the contest, House House isn’t qualified for the award. Issues about the ease of cheating this rule are criticisms of the IGF.
Seems like it’s just punishing devs that know they used AI for something not typically considered “AI use”, but are honest enough to admit it.
Would be nice to see what parts were tagged with AI so people could make their own judgements.
Remember, this Big Walk scenario specifically isn’t about Steam disclosure or the wider debate on what “AI use” in code/game dev is or if that use is ethical/acceptable. The IGF’s rules for award eligibility do define chatbot-assisted troubleshooting as AI use, and that “AI use” means ineligibility for the award.
By the rules of the contest, House House isn’t qualified for the award. Issues about the ease of cheating this rule are criticisms of the IGF.