• qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    To link back to the original spirit of the post: would that be something that people returning to non-digital photography immediatly resort to, considering such individuals would be striving to remove themselves from generated images?

    I’m not afraid to say it: I’d have the technology destroyed and banned tomorrow if I could. Image generation will cause a lot of damage in a near future. Many will have their lives destroyed because of it.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      OP said:

      holy grail of evidence in the age of AI and deepfakes?

      You said basically the same thing:

      hard evidence the image was not tampered with or generated.

      And analog photography is not evidence because it’s easy to fake and that applies to the negatives, too