• fonix232@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I think this does need some more information. Were you for, or against, what kind of 180 was it?

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      no. comment.

      /s

      the sanctity of marriage is broken. increased life expectancy, increased stress, increased cost of living, etc.

      if nothing in this world will change it makes more sense for society to change with it.

      part of that change may include taking multiple partners. gender ratio isn’t important.

      if its difficult for two working adults to afford a home, what about three or four? if they all share living spaces intimately the COL goes down further.

      it’s not just about the sexual gratification, it’s about the care and respect for each other.

      if I was 30 or 40 years younger I would seriously look into polygamous or polyamorus relationships.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          I think that’s kind of the problem.

          you want to marry “the right one” because you plan on being with them forever, alone together.

          whereas if you had more than one person to rely on for “forever”, you might be more open to choices.