• VoterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Designing for a huge amount of users costs money and expertise, so more money, and not even their most optimistic predictions included this many players. If they hadn’t made it big, that money would’ve been wasted. Which games are going to go viral is just insanely hard to predict.

    • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I wonder what’s the scalability issue. I’ve never seen a system that can’t be fixed by throwing more horizontally scalable resources at it.

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Given that when the servers are overloaded you don’t get rewards: They probably have a centralized database or some other centralization issue.

        You can add to a cluster all you want but if you’re using a SQL monolith you’ll get locks.

        If you only have 100k concurrent users you can probably get away with it.

        At 450k they’re running into gridlock