• stormeuh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      IMO this should be the case for everything developed using public money, looking at you, pharmaceutical companies…

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      But it will be written in Schwiizerdütch, so no one outside of Switzerland will understand it. I think it’s a dialect of Perl.

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the way it should be. Governments around the world have spent decades enriching big tech with public money, when they could have pooled their resources and built FOSS software that benefited everyone.

    Same goes for science and everything else funded by tax payers.

  • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wwwaiiiiiittt… So does this mean OS too? Is an entire country switching to the dark side? Linux, I mean Linux

  • nerdschleife@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Meanwhile my country’s apps don’t let you open them if you have Developer Options enabled on android :)

    • FierySpectre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Same here, sure there’s hacks and workarounds that don’t require root… But still why the extra step…

      I just want my window animation speed to be faster, why does that disqualify me from reading stuff sent to my government mailbox.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      And they’ll prob make it illegal for you to bypass and hide developer options because to them that means you’re hacking them.

  • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I work for a company which creates software for the government. Super exited for more OSS projects.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      the government.

      The Swiss government? What’s it like?

      • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yep, the swiss government. Complicated is probably the best word to describe it. We are a very decentralized country (which makes sense for a country that was founded as a coalition to fight the royals that oppressed its people, none of those partners want someone to rule them) so every canton (state) does a lot of things differently than the other ones. But it is nice to see that after years of neglect they try to actually push digitalization by establishing common standards and systems.

  • Randelung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Been contracting for the Swiss government for years, namely ASTRA. They have 0 concept of how that should happen. It’s their IP, but they don’t want to take it, host it, maintain it, or do anything else with it once the project is done.

    Do they just expect others to foot the bill? Sure, free GitHub exists, but everything else? Open sourcing without maintenance is abandonware and usually useless.

    • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      In contrast, abandoned open source software can be picked up and updated by whomever gets paid to, where abandoned closed source software needs to be reimplemented from scratch at great expense to the tax payer.

      Not only that, open source software can be adopted by the community (who already paid for the development through their taxes) for their own purposes. Consider for example the productivity impact on business that starts using tools that it cannot afford to develop itself.

      Office things like document management, workflow management, accounting, but also tools used in the science community, transport and logistics, anything that government does is represented in some other way in society.

      This is a big deal and I hope that it will reverberate across the globe and become the new normal.

      Whilst we’re at it, consider the impact of open data, where government datasets are available to the community.

      • Randelung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ll gladly upload my stuff into some repo they allow me to. I’ve inquired about it in the past - I wrote a piece of sw that fills a requirement hole left by a widely used SCADA tool - but they outright forbid it. That was about a year ago.

        My point is less about open source and more about how they have no clue how to handle their IP even now. It’s a nice gesture at best (at least currently. Maybe there’s more on the way).

        • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Who is “they” in your statement?

          If it’s the company who is contracted by the government, it seems obvious (to me) that the requirements to make it open source provides the push to make it public.

          If it’s the government, then I don’t understand your point.

  • bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This makes me curious in the US on whether or not government app source code would be provided via a FOIA request.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’d think so, but the answer is no. They’ve employed companies like Microsoft, Oracle, etc. to write up the security handbooks that says proprietary software is more secure. Heck, even electronic voting systems in the US is closed-source.

        • John Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Simply, you can’t. I’m personally all for an open source alternative for electronic voting. I can bank online, but not vote online. I’d trust an open source online voting platform more than I’d trust poll workers to not skew some votes. I’d also like to be able to track my vote and ensure it was cast for the person I voted for.