[…] lemmy is a bunch of teenagers […]
The average age of lemmings has actually been found to be around late 30s [1][2].
References
- “RESULTS - 2023 Instance Census for lemmy.ca”. “Otter” (@otter@lemmy.ca). “Lemmy.ca’s Main Community” (main@lemmy.ca). Lemmy.ca. Published: 2024-02-11T02:16:45Z. Accessed: 2024-12-01T09:09Z. https://lemmy.ca/post/15125231.
- §“Section 2: Who are you?”. §“Question 2.1: What age range do you fall into?”
[…]
We can see a nice curve, with a peak around 30-39. So the average age on Lemmy is likely a bit older than other social media platforms, but there’s a good spread nonetheless.
- §“Section 2: Who are you?”. §“Question 2.1: What age range do you fall into?”
- “RESULTS - 2024 Instance Census for lemmy.nz”. “Dave” (@Dave@lemmy.nz). “Aotearoa / New Zealand” (newzealand@lemmy.nz). Lemmy.nz. Published: 2024-08-02T06:53:04Z. Accessed: 2024-12-01T09:15Z. https://lemmy.nz/post/12001861.
- §“Where are we?”. §“What age range do you fall into?”.
[…]
- §“Where are we?”. §“What age range do you fall into?”.
Hrm, this seems logically flawed — it appears to be an association fallacy: Let A be a set containing “Elites”, “Oligarchs”, and “Plutocrats”. Let B be a set of things that are considered “bad”. Let C be a set of things that are considered capitalist. If A is a subset of B, and A is a subset of C (assuming that that is a correct subsumption), that doesn’t imply that C is necessarily a subset of B.
Of course, to avoid forming an argument from fallacy, I would like to clarify that this isn’t to argue that the final implied claim of “capitalism is the problem” is wrong, but simply that the argument used is unsound.