They sleep upside-down, vespertine, and roam the woods at night to forage for wolves.
It’s almost like certain people these days have a Disneyfied definition of “piracy” and like to envision themselves as BFFs w/ drunk Depp —parading around, and blathering on about the world owing them a favor. 🤔 Where did that come from? 🤷🏼♂️
Ah, I see you’re still missing the crux of the matter. Fair. LMK when you parse it. Good luck out there, kiddo.
Hey, it’s ok here to admit that you had a shitty experience that one time with VR. We’re not that other place. No need to inflate the whinge to full-blown hyperbole when grasping for validity, friend. Breathe. 😋
While your logic seems sound on the surface, the simple omission of any insurance mentioned in the first set undermines the rationalization. Whereas, including “and minimum required insurance” to said set would correct the inaccuracy, if only slightly.
Assumptions in formulae should always be clearly notated, if only to prevent their absence from otherwise implying a null/negative value. 🤓
Good effort, though. 🖖🏼
That isn’t the technicality in question, though, and while that cost may be “cheap” (and fluctuate by area/provider), that’s a qualitative judgement not a quantitative value.
The first set lacked any mention of insurance (despite it being a pre-req for legal use of a motor vehicle on public ways), unlike the comparative second set that followed.
If something is going to be “cheaper than” something plus another thing, and the add-on for emphasis is actually a requirement for the former, it doesn’t exactly work as a comparison or even as hyperbole. 🫡🤷🏼♂️🤓
Yeah, but they’re just thirsty by nature. 🤷🏼♂️ Kinda goes without saying. 😝
The one you downloaded in the 90s.
That’s a false equivalency, though, as the former didn’t include matching insurance— nevermind that it’s generally illegal, IIRC, to drive uninsured. 😅☝🏼
I wonder if they function any way similar to the mic/speaker polydirectional thing. 😅
Frankly, I think this is their way of asking nicely, “Please, take good care of this one in particular— or it’ll scream like a magic white boy jungle savior, and nobody wants that, right?” 🤔
Yeah, it’s seemed to me for a while now that the litigations are taking focus away from sustaining the game’s playability, but even in beta phases, I was less than impressed before I shelved it. 🤷🏼♂️
Well then, now I know what my day’s all about
Hell yeah. Fuck that agitprop right in the ear.
That rasp-shaved scrote looks like he re-sanguinates at least weekly to keep up the human façade.
If they refuse to take cash, card, or personal check, that’s a lawsuit. Have fun!
Does he think AI’s hiding at the bottom of a bottle?
The Boondock Saints’ve gotcha sorted, then.
Oh, really? Reported by whom, exactly? Thiel’s slavering familiars? Fuuuuck off.