You don’t have to play politics in those old ways, they don’t work for us anyway. You have to be populist, rail against some villains, you could do it all from your den/study on the internets. Trust me, you can do it.

That is a lot of words. Answering the first sentence however, sugar becomes fat, so it’s a nonsensical argument from the get go. Fructose is converted into fat in the liver (yes with other steps,), glucose used as is, 50/50 ratio, 60/40 fructose/glucose on high fructose corn syrup.

As to the editing of the post claim, I believe you made a second post I took for edited at the time so I was wrong, responding to your previous post while looking at the newer one. But I never confirmed that. But I apologize if so.

To accuse fruit of being the same as raw sugar, with fiber, is sugar industry propaganda all the way. You bought their arguments, read their propaganda, and believed it.

To claim sugar is not different from carbs and starch, is similarly incorrect, laughably so. We all know the body breaks it down to sugar to use it, that doesn’t mean it’s the same to ingest.

I am all over the place here, but you are conflating body fat with eating fatty foods, to excuse the outsized role sugar plays in this process. You believed what you were told, and still do. That is what is going on here. Arguing body fat causes diabetes not sugar is like saying bullets kill people not guns.

There are unhealthy fats to be sure, and other sources of obesity, sugar is the biggest by far though…

Levearging an onion article doesn’t make your argument here. I mean I could accuse the homosexual industrial complex that eisenhower warned us about, what with their pernicious influence, in referencing another onion article, but it doesn’t quite fit does it? That’s a satire article, a joke, so don’t pretend to get offended under false pretense.

Electing our judges and politicians gives us a chance to take them back, giving that power to politicians and their appointees is surrendering it. We are so far passed where we can trust the system. So far.

Allowing politicians to select judges leads us to ruin at this point in time. Maybe not in canada, yet, ya hoser, but in the US for sure. It is laughable to think that allowing the system to appoint judges would work better.

Look at the UK right now! Look at it! How is that working by the way? Or do you not even know they are cancelling the magna carta as we speak?

No amount of half wits endorsing your stance makes your point not dumb as shit. Our system is rotted to the core and you know it, and you want them to appoint our judges? Which leaves us no way of taking it back from them.

Examine the sources of your information, because this is, derogatory terms inserted here, of an opinion.

Money does not win elections as much as they say, you are the one we need in politics. You need to run out of civic duty, if you can be popular enough to win, and I believe you can.

You would rather trust our politicians to appoint them? Ha ha ha.

Sugar causes diabetes. Carbs are very different in your body then sugar, and it looks like your post was edited, idk about fat causing diabetes as you typed, never heard that.

Anointed sivling eh? None of that is accurate, brother.

Carbohydrates and sugar are not the same thing, no matter how many times you regurgitate sugar industry pervertions.

Plants do contain fats so it’s not mutually exclusive. Nuts, beans, all sorts of seeds, all contain high amounts of fat, which is oil.

You are correct there are multiple ways to preserve foods, and sugar is one, as it’s hyrdroscopic (edit, Hygroscopic I think not hydro-,) it grabs all the water so bacteria can’t use it, same as salt does. Vinegar is another. Pressure cooking, 15 pounds for an hour and a half, does the trick. The older way, tyndallization, which Pasteur (and koch, of germany) popularized, before pressure cookers existed, when they definitively proved germ theory to the legions of dumb motherfuckers believing in spontaneous generation, is to heat something to boiling for an hour or so, covered, let it sit for a day, do it again, then another day and another boil, and it kills any hardy bacteria in it. Not quite as reliably as pressure cookers however.

The best way to pressure cook combines both methods for dry goods, you soak them for a day, letting anything growing in them sprout, boil it for long enough to soak up the water level you want in them, dry it out, then pressure cook the next day.

This is a well fleshed out process.

You have no idea what you are talking about, pressure cooking kills botulism. You have never canned food before clearly. You are just luck louis pasteur isn’t on this thread.

Good god man, a single teaspoon in my tea is too much. If I do super strong tea or coffee, like 3 tea bags in a half cup, mixed with half whole milk, a full teaspoon is about right to taste.

10 is just too much, it’s horrible for you too, even if you don’t get diabetes, it crashes your energy level, cut it out for a couple of weeks then get a big dose of sugar and you will see what it does to you.

That is how any food works actually. You don’t need sugar to preserve things.

16 to 20 teaspoons of sugar or the equivalent, in a 16 oz pop I’ve read. Can you imagine putting 10 teaspoons of sugar in a cup of coffee?

The danish aren’t all overweight though. 50% of white people in the US are now. 60% or more of the general population last I checked, and it takes an immigrant on average 7 years to become as overweight as the average American.

So something is different.

They might use a toxic emulsifier in it for that reason.

You don’t need any sugar to preserve, you just need to cook it at 15 lbs of pressure for an hour and a half.

Imagine how we feel in the US being given numbers interchangeably in ounces and pounds. Nothing like dividing random numbers by 16 in your head in the store. Grams would be so much easier for this purpose.