• krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      That’s not what the data says. These kids are going to outpace traditional learning kids by miles.

          • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            26 days ago
            • “AI should serve as a scaffold for cognitive construction rather than a substitute.”
            • “…the teacher’s role is shifting from knowledge transmission to instructional design and behavioral facilitation… Teachers must develop digital literacy and data fluency while acting as safeguards against over‑automation, ensuring that human judgment and educational values mediate AI adoption.”
            • “…while AI offers efficiency and feedback advantages, traditional teaching remains essential for tasks requiring cultural interpretation, discourse depth, and emotional connection. A blended model—AI for repetitive or procedural tasks and teachers for critical discourse—appears most effective.”

            This study explicitly does not advocate for replacing teachers with AI, and repeatedly cautions against doing so

              • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                26 days ago

                Ironically… so did I 🙃 But I hand-verified everything it said, and adjusted the quotes.

            • krisevol@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              And the school that is opening will still have human “guides” so I’m curious how it will work out. I agree it should be a mix of AI and human, and not fully AI.

          • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            These findings highlight both the promise and the limitations of AI in language education, underscoring the importance of teacher facilitation and thoughtful design of human–AI interaction to support deep and sustainable learning.

            The problem is there’s no teachers in this scenario, at least that’s my understanding

            • krisevol@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              You’re right, they will have “guides” instead of teachers. This might be to far, but we won’t know until they try it. A mix of human and AI teachers would probably be best.

      • CTDummy@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        AI hasn’t even been around long enough for any meaningful data to be collected surely. Also, post this “data” you’ve twice now claimed exists.

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          Why are you hounding them for the data? They would swear on their honor that Grok said it, and that’s somehow not enough for you. They even asked a follow-up “Are you sure?”, to which Grok reaffirmed its findings. Maybe you should be practicing law if you want to act like you care so much about “evidence”.

      • Really? Because the data I’ve seen says the exact opposite and that Gen Z is the first generation of people dumber than the generation before them. These kids are already fucked and AI is going to make it even worse.

        • Pinto, the Bean@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          I’ve seen says the exact opposite and that Gen Z is the first generation of people dumber than the generation before them.

          Do you have a citation for this?

            • Pinto, the Bean@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Post

              The New York Post (NY Post), founded as the New York Evening Post (originally New-York Evening Post), is an American conservative[3] daily tabloid newspaper published in New York City. Th

              The Post has been criticized since the beginning of Murdoch’s ownership for sensationalism, blatant advocacy, and conservative bias. In 1980, the Columbia Journalism Review stated that the “New York Post is no longer merely a journalistic problem. It is a social problem—a force for evil.”[9] The Post has been accused of contorting its news coverage to suit Murdoch’s business needs, in particular avoiding subjects which could be unflattering to the government of the People’s Republic of China, where Murdoch has invested heavily in satellite television.[63]

              On October 14, 2020, three weeks before the 2020 United States presidential election, the Post published a front-page story purporting to reveal “smoking gun” emails recovered from a laptop abandoned by Hunter Biden at a computer repair store in Wilmington, Delaware.[105] The only sources named in the story were Trump personal attorney Rudy Giuliani and strategy advisor Steve Bannon.[105] The story came under heavy criticism from other news sources and anonymous reporters at the Post itself for “flimsy” reporting, including questions about the reliability of its sourcing and the lack of outreach to either Hunter Biden or the Joe Biden campaign for pre-publication comment.[106][107]

              Right wing tabloid, you fell for republican propaganda.

                • Pinto, the Bean@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  25 days ago

                  Sure, anything is better than a tabloid that supports Trump.

                  EDIT: So no proof that isn’t from a right wing propaganda piece, what I thought.