• pmk@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I think there is a fatigue. Morally, I can’t justify eating animal products, but I do eat cheese and drink milk. I should take the bus instead of driving, but sometimes I use my car out of convenience. Chocolate means exploiting workers in some country. Etc. People see the world burning and feel powerless.

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, that could be some of it. We can’t all be perfect all the time. It’s impossible.

      I’d appreciate more honest appraisals, though. “I know Twitter is garbage run by a Nazi, but I got linked to it and scrolled a bit” is far better than “well other people are worse so who cares”. There’s this childish whataboutism that a lot of people bring out to justify their poor behavior.

      • pmk@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I agree, honesty is a good first step. So, given all this, should we focus on simply being the more attractive option? Or a combination of principles and convenience? If the good option is cheaper or more convenient, we wouldn’t strictly need principles and moral arguments. I’m just thinking of strategy here, it can feel good to be a righteous preacher, but what actually gets us the results we want?