In a developer panel at the console game developer conference in South Korea, Harada shared his raw thoughts on the challenges on the Xbox Series S.

  • fonix232@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    In context it makes more sense.

    You develop an AAA title with high hardware requirements because hell, the game engine needs it.

    Then comes Xbox and says “hey here’s half the specs of the mainstream baseline, make your game run on it”

    It is a bit shitty.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The XBOX Series S doesn’t come to you after you finished your work. The Series S is there since the beginning. If you ignored it, its on you. Microsoft just says, if you want to publish your game, it has to run on both variants. That’s not shitty. Games are released on PC anyway (at least the Tekken games), and so have to run on hardware similar in performance to Series S.

      • saturnapy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It wasn’t just it has to run on both variants, they required full feature parity. And the series S was way weaker hardware than even budget PCs of the time.

    • copingwithelmons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Hey man, not everyone can afford expensive hardware and you don’t have to realease on it.

      Everyone deserves culture.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        With consoles, the console is the baseline… Adding an extra entry that is half the specs, while the competition adds a “pro” version that is beefier, makes things harder.

        • copingwithelmons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Also, “everyone deserves culture” and “you don’t have to release on it” is kinda antithetical.

          Everyone deserves culture to the extent you don’t impose on others. I won’t judge anyone if they don’t want to put in the work for series S with limited ROI. But a lot of devs do and it’s nice to have that available to you for an amount that’s not exorbitant.

          With consoles, the console is the baseline… Adding an extra entry that is half the specs, while the competition adds a “pro” version that is beefier, makes things harder.

          The whole point is that you have something more affordable for those folks who can only go for the affordable option.

          Oh, and you do have to release on it. Microsoft demands parity, which is the issue.

          Oh, I was then wrong there.

    • dudeface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      To be fair the CPU is similar enough and GPU workloads are easier to scale

      Memory management would be the most challenging thing

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That’s the worst part, the memory is cut back too much. Now from todays standpoint, it might make sense. But back then at launch, memory wasn’t this expensive thing as we know it now. Not only is it just 10gb, even handheld PCs have 16, its also much slower memory connection. This is too much.